![]() ![]() I also believe that software companies encourage the movement toward self-paced learning because it fuels the perception that they are modern and current and that their software is easy to use. The use of multimedia and interactive content is attractive and can be engaging. No one can deny it is costly to take someone away from the office and out of production for multiple days. ![]() ![]() ![]() As everyone seeks the quickest route to develop skills and reach proficiency, demand has increased, and so too has the variety of options and providers. But… is there really no place for traditional learning? What about a combination?įor a variety of reasons, more and more companies and individuals are looking to self-paced learning methods as alternative options to instructor-led training. I can see the benefits of self-paced eLearning, where someone develops CAD software skills without ever leaving the office or speaking with an expert. I came across a Tweet recently that implied traditional learning, whatever that is, is “dead”! Not surprisingly maybe, this claim was made by someone deeply involved in the production of self-paced eLearning. It’s a valid question when we are often tasked with multiple projects and tight deadlines…Is there a way to learn CAD software that is faster than attending instructor-led training? Many people wonder if there a faster way to learn how to use CAD software. A shortcut implies a faster route to a destination or a quicker way to achieve a goal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |